{"id":10143,"date":"2020-10-14T21:03:09","date_gmt":"2020-10-14T21:03:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/?p=10143"},"modified":"2020-10-14T21:03:09","modified_gmt":"2020-10-14T21:03:09","slug":"new-report-compares-driver-fatigue-detection-devices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/new-report-compares-driver-fatigue-detection-devices\/","title":{"rendered":"New report compares driver fatigue detection devices"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A new report has been published that compares a range of devices available to help reduce driver fatigue.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>Fatigue and distraction detection: A review of commercially available devices to detect fatigue and distraction in drivers<\/em>\u201d provides a detailed comparison of around 100 technologies and systems, with the overall aim to provide a recommendation on which devices to consider for further testing or use.<\/p>\n<p>The results of the comparison suggest that there is not a single system that outperforms all other systems on all criteria. The report therefore suggests that, for optimal monitoring of fatigue and distraction, a combination of systems or system features may be needed. Selection of a particular system will also depend on user preferences.<\/p>\n<p>The report was written by SWOV, and commissioned by Shell Global Solutions International B.V., BP International Limited, Total S.A., and Chevron Services Company.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.swov.nl\/en\/publication\/fatigue-and-distraction-detection\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">View the report<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new report has been published that compares a range of devices available to help reduce driver fatigue. \u201cFatigue and distraction detection: A review of commercially available devices to detect fatigue and distraction in drivers\u201d provides a detailed comparison of around 100 technologies and systems, with the overall aim to provide a recommendation on which [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":10144,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1520],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-risk-management"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10143","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10143"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10143\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10144"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edriving.com\/three60\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}